You couldn’t be more wrong Miss USA. While all the progressive media outlets are your cheerleaders today, it doesn’t make your answer right.

Watch Deshauna Barber’s response below when asked: “The Pentagon recently made the decision to open up combat jobs to women. Some have questioned whether this has put political correctness over our military’s ability to perform at the highest level. What are your thoughts?”

Listen up Deshauna, and all you other current year feminists, you’re not equal to men. We are different creatures, sorry it’s like science or something. We aren’t talking about a paint ball game here, this is the military. Real life boom boom bang bangs. You don’t always wake up when you get shot with these guns.

menwomen-physiology

Let’s look at some stats, shall we? Those pesky Marines did one themselves, read about it here.

A yearlong Marine Corps study trying to understand how gender integration would affect combat readiness has found that all-male units were faster, more lethal and able to evacuate casualties in less time.

You see, you want people that can hit the intended target more often than not. You want that person to be able to drag you out of danger if you by chance got injured in battle. Silly men, I know.

One BIG thing in this study that you have to realize is this. This was an all men squad vs an integrated men/women squad. I can’t even imagine if this was a gender vs gender study that they conducted. Quick tip, the results wouldn’t of been good for the women.

Overall, the report says, all-male teams and crews outperformed mixed-gender ones on 93 out of 134 tasks evaluated. All-male teams were universally faster “in each tactical movement.”

Just because of you politically correct sooky babies, you’re literally sending women to die, because progress. Not to mention the fact that men naturally want to protect women, the men are now subjected to increased risk of a cozy one bedroom, 6 feet under. We’re dumb that way.

Here’s a great tweet from a Purple Heart, wounded warrior that basically summarizes this article in 140 characters:

Comments

comments